}
-12-
Submit no misdirection
no ground to interfere with
conviction.
59
CCURT ADJOURNED TO 2.30 F., CN 12.10.34
James J. Hayden.
11.10.34
12/10/34
2.30 P..
Same Counsel & Solicitors (Appellant not present).
1. Lim addresses Ct. in reply.
re Lisdirection as to 2 bruises on p.14 of 9.-up para.
11
3?
p.13 "It may be no more
?
19
9
a
#
#1
than that.
籍
p.15 "The alternative is
not to accept at the moment E. Davies' evidence.
As to Law,
2 C.A.R. 207 R.v. Cohen
7 C.A.R.
4
A
R. V.
alison
1 C.A.R.
234
-
R. V.
Lucas
5 C.A.R.
193
A
R. v. Loates
11 C.A.R.
166
R. V.
Kurash. Refers to lines 33-36
on p.169
23 C. A.R.
190
- R. v. Morrissey.
20 C.A.R
162
R. v. Driscoll.
Deals with His-direction 2(a)
re rounds of law re grounds 1, 2 & 3.
There case equally consistent with innocence case
should be withdrawn from Jury.
Where whole of evidence equally consistent with guilt
or innocence case should be withdrawn.
ce.
9 Halsbury 449.
Last ground re admissibility of Irs. Fairburn's eviden-
trial.
3 C.A.R. 259 R. v. Payne re no objection taken at
14 C.A.R.
R. v. Sanders.
s case as
Did not raise objection at close of Crown
taken by surprise when told Mary P. was not going to give
evidence.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.